Latest

 

UNFCCC meetings – Panama

Anette Engelund Friis from the Danish Agriculture and Food Council filed the following report:

//  Panama – Summary and way forward

The outcome of this years' COP is expected to be yet another set of agreements, or a Durban outcome that will build on last years' Cancun Agreements. This should bring us one step closer to a global agreement.
The Panama sessions did not on the surface move us closer to an agreement on agriculture. Negotiations on agriculture were blocked – not because of agriculture, but because a new framing text for the sectoral approaches chapter was presented by India on behalf of G77 at the first informal. The week was spent discussing the framing text and the mandate for discussing sectoral approaches. At the last informal, New Zealand tabled a new text on agriculture, based on the existing text but shortened primarily cutting out contentious bits. The text was supported by several Annex 1 countries. This means that there is now 3 options on agriculture: 1) the text from Cancun (updated in Bonn in June), 2) no text, 3) the New Zealand proposal. It is difficult to see how agreement on one text can be reached. There was agreement that the facilitator should prepare a note, as basis for negotiations in Durban. There is still hope that there will be an agreement on agriculture. COP 17 is an African COP which should put focus on agriculture. In the run up to Durban several initiatives on agriculture has taken place, among the most important are meetings between African ministers of agriculture, calling for an agreement on agriculture at COP 17. During COP 17 a high level meeting focusing on agriculture is planned. This gives reason for some hope that there will be an agreement on agriculture.
It is important that farmers' organizations make their voice heard in this process, and that we urge parties to reach agreement on agriculture.


//  Meetings

Meetings with Annex 1 agriculture negotiators:
Negotiators called two meetings with NGO's to discuss prospects for reaching agreement on agriculture. The goal was to exchange views on agriculture in the UNFCCC process.

Meetings with Executive Secretary, LCA and KP Chairs:
The executive secretary, the LCA and KP Chairs were giving briefings during the session. The Executive Secretary and the LCA Chair saw agriculture as a deliverable for Durban.

//  Negotiations

AWG-KP:

Focus in the KP was on a second commitment period, after the first period expires at the end of 2012. Parties were concentrating on outstanding issues and further clarification of the options for mitigation targets, the possible nature and rules for a second commitment period.

AWG-LCA:

There were extended procedural discussion in the LCA, based on Decision 1/CP.16 and the Bali Action Plan, and also discussions about observer participation in informals. It was decided to open the first and last informal of each session to observers. Informal groups were established on adaptation, finance, technology, capacity building, shared vision, review of the global long-term goal, legal options, and diverse issues related to mitigation. The outcome of most of these informal groups was text to be forwarded to Durban for further discussions. There was relatively modest progress and there will be a lot of work to be done in Durban.

Agriculture (in LCA):

A text on agriculture was ready for agreement in Copenhagen in December 2009. This text was moved forward to Cancun, where parties also did not succeed in agreeing on the text. This text requests SBSTA to establish a programme of work on agriculture, focusing on both mitigation and adaptation.
Agriculture was not on the UNFCCC agenda until April 2009, where SBSTA organized a work shop in Bonn, after which agriculture was formally put on the agenda. For reasons now unknown, agriculture was placed in the mitigation section, in the sectoral approaches chapter together with bunker fuels. Bunker fuels are much more contentious than agriculture, and are one of the reasons agriculture has been held back.

//  Background

The period from 2008 to 2012 is known as the Kyoto Commitment Period, where Annex 1 countries have committed to reducing green house gas emissions with a given percentage rate. Overall, the Kyoto Proto-col reduces green house gas emissions by 5 percent compared to emissions in 1990.

COP 13 in Bali established two working groups to lead negotiations towards COP 15 and an agreement to follow the Kyoto Protocol. The two working groups are Kyoto Protocol (KP) and Long-term Cooperative Action (LCA), working on the basis of the Bali Action Plan. Both working groups were extended beyond Copenhagen.

In 2009 all Parties were working towards a binding agreement on COP 15 in Copenhagen in December 2009. They did not succeed in reaching a binding agreement. The result was the Copenhagen Accord, which constituted a basis for negotiations in Cancún, and has now been consolidated, in the agreed Cancún package.

The UNFCCC process has been revitalized with the agreement reached in Cancún, and there is now renewed hope of reaching agreement on substantial issues in South Africa later this year.


More
+ 0
+ 0

 

En route to Durban - African ministers take stance on climate smart-agriculture

African ministers responsible for agriculture and country representatives met in Johannesburg, South Africa to consult and take a clear stance on climate-smart agriculture in light of the upcoming COP 17, which seen by many as a turning point in the talks on climate. Seven ministers attended the conference while a total of 23 countries were represented. The gathering yielded a communiqué around "Africa: A Call to Action" that was to be forwarded to the African Ministers Conference on Environment (AMCEN) as well as other important structures and processes, including the UN General Assembly for consideration and further processing.

Download

Communiqué


 


+ 0
+ 0

 

Africa charts way for investment in climate-smart agriculture

The AUC-NPCA released a draft climate-smart agriculture framework document in view of establishing an operational working investment platform for the cause. The said platform aims to scale up African-led action and donor-led support for climate change-smart agriculture in countries engaged in CAADP and expand continental, regional and country capacities to implement climate-smart investment plans and programmes.


//  Download

Framework


+ 0
+ 0

 

Commission to propose course of action on sustainable food system

"The food system is really not sustainable,” says Professor Sir John Beddington, U.K. Government Chief Scientific Adviser and Chair of the Commission on Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change.


“What is happening is it’s getting big subsidies of fossil fuels, it is over-exploiting water, [and] it is using land in unacceptable ways,” Beddington said.

The Commission aims to identify and promote specific national, regional, and global policies that are needed to usher in a global food system that is based on sustainable agriculture and contributes to food security, poverty reduction, and climate change adaptation and mitigation. “The interaction between climate change, food, water, and energy security is absolutely critical. And we would make an enormous error if we actually tried to deal with one and ignore the others,” Beddington says.

Read the full article by Matt Styslinger on Nourishing the Planet


More
+ 0
+ 0

 

Ag&CC virtual briefing a rich exchange

2011-07-14_Negra-PresentationMeeting for its first multimedia online briefing yesterday, the Platform agriculture and climate change working group shared information on key processes underway to raise the profile of climate-smart agriculture in the UNFCCC negotiations and the run up to Rio+20.


 

//  Agriculture post-Bonn & Commission on Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change

The 90min online briefing featured the sessions and speakers, and forged linkages between several Platform members and partners to share information and support various processes in the run-up to UNFCCC COP17 and Rio+20.









More
+ 0
+ 0

Page 9 of 15

9