Resource details
| Rural and Urban Dynamics and Poverty: Evidence from China and India, IFPRI Discussion Paper 196, 2005 |
| Written/Published in 2005 by Shenggen Fan, Connie Chan-Kang, and Anit Mukherjee |
Extract
The analysis indicates that, in the case of China, agricultural growth
has contributed to poverty reduction in both rural and urban areas, but its
effect on rural poverty is larger than its effect on urban poverty. The results
for India also clearly show that rural growth helps to reduce rural poverty,
but, unlike China, it has no statistically significant effect on urban poverty
reduction. Urban growth does not have an important effect on rural poverty
reduction in either country, and in fact, in China, the results suggest urban
growth correlates with an increase in rural poverty. The lack of effect of
urban growth on rural poverty is likely due to several barriers, such as
inadequate infrastructure, that prevent desirable spillover effects. |
Organisation
International Food Policy Research Institute |
Sector
Growth, Economic Development & the Role of Agriculture Poverty & Poverty Reduction
|
| Contributed on December 3, 2007 by Daniel Gerecke |
| Last updated on December 3, 2007 |
| Resource "Rural-Urban-Dynamics-and-Poverty-IFPRI-Discussion-Paper-196.pdf" (195.31 KB) can be viewed & downloaded by everybody. |
| Viewed/Downloaded 370 x |
-
|